partec cyflow st Search Results


cyflow cytometer  (Chemunex Inc)
90
Chemunex Inc cyflow cytometer
Cyflow Cytometer, supplied by Chemunex Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cyflow cytometer/product/Chemunex Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cyflow cytometer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
cyflow space cytometer  (Partec)
86
Partec cyflow space cytometer
Cyflow Space Cytometer, supplied by Partec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cyflow space cytometer/product/Partec
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cyflow space cytometer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
facscount  (Becton Dickinson)
90
Becton Dickinson facscount
(A) Number of BD Vacutainer CD4 Stabilization Tube samples on BD <t>FacsCount</t> at days 0–30. (B) Number of BD Vacutainer CD4 Stabilization Tube samples on Partec Cyflow at days 0–30.
Facscount, supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/facscount/product/Becton Dickinson
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
facscount - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


(A) Number of BD Vacutainer CD4 Stabilization Tube samples on BD FacsCount at days 0–30. (B) Number of BD Vacutainer CD4 Stabilization Tube samples on Partec Cyflow at days 0–30.

Journal: PLoS ONE

Article Title: Using BD Vacutainer CD4 Stabilization Tubes for Absolute Cluster of Differentiation Type 4 Cell Count Measurement on BD FacsCount and Partec Cyflow Cytometers: A Method Comparison Study from Zimbabwe

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136537

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Number of BD Vacutainer CD4 Stabilization Tube samples on BD FacsCount at days 0–30. (B) Number of BD Vacutainer CD4 Stabilization Tube samples on Partec Cyflow at days 0–30.

Article Snippet: Based on a random effects mixed model with random intercept and random slope, ST results were on average 8.32 cells/μL lower on Partec Cyflow than on BD FacsCount (95%CI 4.57–12.08; p-value <0.001), with an average reduction per day of 1.95 cells/μL (95%CI 1.51–2.40; p-value <0.001).

Techniques:

(A) Absolute CD4 cell counts of BD Vacutainer CD4 Stabilization Tube samples on BD FacsCount and Partec Cyflow at days 0–30. (B) Agreement of BD Vacutainer CD4 Stabilization Tube sample results on BD FacsCount at days 0–30 with EDTA sample results on BD FacsCount at day 0. (C) Agreement of BD Vacutainer CD4 Stabilization Tube sample results on Partec Cyflow at days 0–30 with EDTA sample results on BD FacsCount at day 0. (D) Agreement of BD Vacutainer CD4 Stabilization Tube sample results on Partec Cyflow at days 0–30 with same day results of BD Vacutainer CD4 Stabilization Tube sample results on BD FacsCount.

Journal: PLoS ONE

Article Title: Using BD Vacutainer CD4 Stabilization Tubes for Absolute Cluster of Differentiation Type 4 Cell Count Measurement on BD FacsCount and Partec Cyflow Cytometers: A Method Comparison Study from Zimbabwe

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136537

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Absolute CD4 cell counts of BD Vacutainer CD4 Stabilization Tube samples on BD FacsCount and Partec Cyflow at days 0–30. (B) Agreement of BD Vacutainer CD4 Stabilization Tube sample results on BD FacsCount at days 0–30 with EDTA sample results on BD FacsCount at day 0. (C) Agreement of BD Vacutainer CD4 Stabilization Tube sample results on Partec Cyflow at days 0–30 with EDTA sample results on BD FacsCount at day 0. (D) Agreement of BD Vacutainer CD4 Stabilization Tube sample results on Partec Cyflow at days 0–30 with same day results of BD Vacutainer CD4 Stabilization Tube sample results on BD FacsCount.

Article Snippet: Based on a random effects mixed model with random intercept and random slope, ST results were on average 8.32 cells/μL lower on Partec Cyflow than on BD FacsCount (95%CI 4.57–12.08; p-value <0.001), with an average reduction per day of 1.95 cells/μL (95%CI 1.51–2.40; p-value <0.001).

Techniques:

Percentage of correctly classified BD Vacutainer CD4 Stabilization Tube sample results on BD FacsCount for ART eligibility thresholds of 350 and 500 CD4 cells/μL over time with EDTA tube results on FacsCount at day 0 as reference methodology.

Journal: PLoS ONE

Article Title: Using BD Vacutainer CD4 Stabilization Tubes for Absolute Cluster of Differentiation Type 4 Cell Count Measurement on BD FacsCount and Partec Cyflow Cytometers: A Method Comparison Study from Zimbabwe

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136537

Figure Lengend Snippet: Percentage of correctly classified BD Vacutainer CD4 Stabilization Tube sample results on BD FacsCount for ART eligibility thresholds of 350 and 500 CD4 cells/μL over time with EDTA tube results on FacsCount at day 0 as reference methodology.

Article Snippet: Based on a random effects mixed model with random intercept and random slope, ST results were on average 8.32 cells/μL lower on Partec Cyflow than on BD FacsCount (95%CI 4.57–12.08; p-value <0.001), with an average reduction per day of 1.95 cells/μL (95%CI 1.51–2.40; p-value <0.001).

Techniques:

Correlation of BD Vacutainer CD4 Stabilization Tube sample results on BD FacsCount and Partec Cyflow over time.

Journal: PLoS ONE

Article Title: Using BD Vacutainer CD4 Stabilization Tubes for Absolute Cluster of Differentiation Type 4 Cell Count Measurement on BD FacsCount and Partec Cyflow Cytometers: A Method Comparison Study from Zimbabwe

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136537

Figure Lengend Snippet: Correlation of BD Vacutainer CD4 Stabilization Tube sample results on BD FacsCount and Partec Cyflow over time.

Article Snippet: Based on a random effects mixed model with random intercept and random slope, ST results were on average 8.32 cells/μL lower on Partec Cyflow than on BD FacsCount (95%CI 4.57–12.08; p-value <0.001), with an average reduction per day of 1.95 cells/μL (95%CI 1.51–2.40; p-value <0.001).

Techniques:

Similarity of BD Vacutainer CD4 Stabilization Tube sample results on BD FacsCount and Partec Cyflow over time.

Journal: PLoS ONE

Article Title: Using BD Vacutainer CD4 Stabilization Tubes for Absolute Cluster of Differentiation Type 4 Cell Count Measurement on BD FacsCount and Partec Cyflow Cytometers: A Method Comparison Study from Zimbabwe

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136537

Figure Lengend Snippet: Similarity of BD Vacutainer CD4 Stabilization Tube sample results on BD FacsCount and Partec Cyflow over time.

Article Snippet: Based on a random effects mixed model with random intercept and random slope, ST results were on average 8.32 cells/μL lower on Partec Cyflow than on BD FacsCount (95%CI 4.57–12.08; p-value <0.001), with an average reduction per day of 1.95 cells/μL (95%CI 1.51–2.40; p-value <0.001).

Techniques:

Percentage of correctly classified BD Vacutainer CD4 Stabilization Tube sample results on Partec Cyflow for ART eligibility thresholds of 350 and 500 CD4 cells/μL over time with EDTA tube results on FacsCount at day 0 as reference methodology.

Journal: PLoS ONE

Article Title: Using BD Vacutainer CD4 Stabilization Tubes for Absolute Cluster of Differentiation Type 4 Cell Count Measurement on BD FacsCount and Partec Cyflow Cytometers: A Method Comparison Study from Zimbabwe

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136537

Figure Lengend Snippet: Percentage of correctly classified BD Vacutainer CD4 Stabilization Tube sample results on Partec Cyflow for ART eligibility thresholds of 350 and 500 CD4 cells/μL over time with EDTA tube results on FacsCount at day 0 as reference methodology.

Article Snippet: Based on a random effects mixed model with random intercept and random slope, ST results were on average 8.32 cells/μL lower on Partec Cyflow than on BD FacsCount (95%CI 4.57–12.08; p-value <0.001), with an average reduction per day of 1.95 cells/μL (95%CI 1.51–2.40; p-value <0.001).

Techniques: